Oddworld Forums

Oddworld Forums (http://www.oddworldforums.net/index.php)
-   Oddworld Discussion (http://www.oddworldforums.net/forumdisplay.php?f=6)
-   -   Upgrades (and 2.5D gameplay discussion) (http://www.oddworldforums.net/showthread.php?t=19431)

STM 07-30-2010 03:27 AM

But Oddworld occurs on two planes or more because you can see what goes on in the back round and sometimes play in the background (thus '2.5D')

Wil 07-30-2010 03:34 AM

I don't know how the switching between depths is implemented or what it's used for (video?), but having small interactions with depth does not make something not 2.5D. 2.5D games can have the path twist, split and cross in the depth axis. The important point is that the gameplay is 2D.

If AO and AE used 3D environments, they would be 2.5D despite the dual depths.

MeechMunchie 07-30-2010 03:38 AM

How about we just call Little Big Planet 'single plane 3D' and Abe's Oddysee 'dual plane 2D'?

STM 07-30-2010 03:38 AM

Sounds about right

Nate 07-30-2010 03:53 AM

Except that LBP occurs on three planes.

MeechMunchie 07-30-2010 03:54 AM

'Triple plane 3D', then.

Nate 07-30-2010 05:22 AM

It's either 3d or Triple Plane 2d.

MeechMunchie 07-30-2010 05:43 AM

Hey, I'm just trying to help, I've never even played LBP. It's up to you what you call it.

Havoc 07-30-2010 09:05 PM

Isn't 2.5D simple 3D models in used in a 2D gameplay? Like the new Donkey Kong Country:

http://www.pocket-lint.com/images/vv...-preview-0.jpg

Phylum 07-30-2010 09:53 PM

In the commons sense, yes.

Namida 07-31-2010 02:16 AM

The best example I can think of of 2.5D in gaming is Pandemonium (and of course it's sequel). Try it. The environment is completely 3D, yet at no point is any depth involved (well, I think there's a couple of boss battles where it is, but that's it). You can have an endless looping circle, the path can spiral around, but you still can only move left, right, up and down - not back or forwards.

MeechMunchie 07-31-2010 05:16 AM

Bob Came In Pieces is another good 2.5D game.

Nate 07-31-2010 05:51 AM

It just occurred to me that all our definitions of 2D, 2.5D and 3D are going to be thrown out the window once 3D TVs and gaming become common. We're gonna have to come up with a whole new set of words to describe a game set in 3D but portrayed on a 2D screen and a game that is displayed on a 3D screen with 3D graphics but 2D gameplay. Ugh.


EDIT: And then we'll have to come up with new words once SCIENCE invents proper 360° 3D holographic displays to supersede the currently new 'Kinda looks 3D thanks to stereoscopic effect' technology.

Josh 07-31-2010 06:03 AM



Quick! Fetch a dictionary!

Havoc 07-31-2010 07:47 AM

Gaming on a 3D TV is not going to take off for at least another decade. Trust me on that. The technology is still way to sucky for it to be any fun for longer than 2 minutes.

STM 08-03-2010 06:45 AM

Agreed with Havoc, it's not even that 3D, I went to a prototype festival in Berlin in February and the 3D television was a prime thing, tbh it's nowhere near as good as 3D cinema.

Fischkopf 08-03-2010 09:37 AM

:

()
Isn't 2.5D simple 3D models in used in a 2D gameplay? Like the new Donkey Kong Country:

http://www.pocket-lint.com/images/vv...-preview-0.jpg

WOAH there will be a new Donkey Kong? :D

lismati 08-03-2010 11:29 AM

Yup, on Wii - Donkey Kong Country Returns. You didn't watch E3?