Please explain how that differs from 'Funniest Member'.

The funniest member doesn't necessarily have to be witty to evoke laughter. If a member says "durr penis" and others laugh, then they're funny but not witty. That's the way I see it anyway

Durr penis.

Abe619 likes getting eaten by hot Scrabs.

Errr, Nate, you used an old list of awards.

So I have. I blame T-Nex for not listing the 2009 Awards in that other thread and carefully gloss over the fact that I didn't notice that the last awards would not have been 2008.

*FIXES*

Everyone now go and check out the fixed list in my first post.

I was sleep deprived during the last couple of days! <.< I blame sleep deprivation!

Better, but there's still too many.

No there isn't, shut up.

"Least funny member" maybe? Or is that rude and unfunny?

"Most unintentionally unfunny member"?

What about "member who always takes it too far"

We could probably do away with the Best Couple award. That's my only suggestion.

if we do, i reckon it should be replaced with 'The Oddworld Forums Double Act', widens it out a bit.

That's exactly the same award under a different name.

i thought the 'Best Couple' was for members that had met each other or were humping?

What would the double act be?

All my nominations are porbably only going to vary among 6-7 members.

I still suggest:

Best member who left then came back.

We have some good choices for that one, actually.

I suggest not being able to vote for one member for more than two/three awards. Just to even things out a bit.

Maybe even just two. I mean, I think the forums will be pretty polarized on who deserves what.

Yeah, we tend to have yearly winners: Nate, Bullet Magnet, OANST.

I think that's largely unfair on some of the members who are overlooked enough not to get any awards but not overlooked enough to get the 'Underrated' award.

Fan Corner Suite should probably be exempt from this rule however.

I don't think it's that serious. You should be able to vote for whoever you want for the award.

Plus, the awards would not accurately describe how we feel anymore. Yeah, I'm not on board.

Yeah, I agree with Oanst now. I was looking down the award and already plan on putting "NA" on some of them. Our forums just aren't that diverse anymore.

Eh, I stand unstood.

Plus, let's say that you spend your two votes on Sekto for awards that others don't spend their two votes on him for. Now, Sekto doesn't get any of the awards that he would have because people could only vote for him twice, but didn't vote on the same things (even though they wanted to vote for him on the others, as well). It doesn't work.

Two votes on Sekto? :confused:

Seriously though, I can see why MY PREVIOUS SUGGESTION won't work. I just thought it might even things out a bit.

Creator of the greatest meme

That's all i got.

I don't think there should be a per-person vote limit. If you think one person fits five awards, then that's fine.

Tally them up from there. I don't see the problem really.

If you can find a person worthy of five of those awards at once.

Oh, it's possible. A lot of people run clsoe too, so I plan on diversifying my nominations.