Noooo. None of the are ugly. All of gods creations are beautifull. Except people.

Agreed.

Well, about the people part. I think lobsters are pretty god damned hideous.

nah. Lobsters are cuuuuute. And people are really only ugly inside. Some of them. Others can be cute. Like me!

Especialy if thats you on your avatar :p.

Agreed on the people thing though.

Yeah. I had some professional pictures taken when I was trying to get into modeling. Unfortunately it cost a lot of money and I never did take off as a model. I do like having the pictures, though.

Jesus hates liars more than he hates faggots.

Excuse me? That was totally uncalled for. Do you see so few pretty girls that you find it impossible that this could be me? I worked hard for these photos and I'm proud of them. I would appreciate if you didn't call me a liar.

Actually, yes. My fiance is so morbidly obese that she blocks out the sun...Let alone my view of pretty girls.

I'm also pretty sure I've seen a spread in Maxim, Stuff or FHM featuring the woman in your user picture.

Maybe you saw someone who LOOKS like me. I don't need to explain my self to you anyway. I like that picture of me so I used it. Stop being a jerk.

Be patient! God isn't finished with me yet.

you're right. I shouldn't get upset. God will open your heart. I love you.



I love you long time.

Well, like I said, that Jesus did a real number on my anus. And what rough hands he had!

I offered him some lotion, but he just punched me in the back of my head.

If Jesus can't donkey punch then what is the point of being Jesus?

I hear he gets free eye and dental.

he gets it in your eye and on your dental.

Hey hey hey, thats enough. Stop flaming please.

I dunno if thats you, but if it is you are a very pretty lady :).

I seriously think we should stop eating KFC and start eating KFPETA...I mean, if they're gonna raise that much of a fuss, then why not?

I can't be bothered to read most of the crap that's in this forum. I'm apathetic and lazy, so meh. However, i will say i kind of like PETA, but i do think they're f*cking morons.

Why put Vivisectionists through utter crap, when they're trying to help people, when they could easily be out there sorting out w*nkers who commit acts of cruelty for the sheer pleasure of it.

Meh.

That is all.

OMFG JACOB!!!!!!

And that's all I have to say.

*goes off and wanks himself in happiness*

It's oh-so-witty banter, not flaming.

OMGWTFBBQ NEWSARTICLE:

Judge Keeps PETA Animal Killers On A Tight Leash
On Wednesday afternoon in a North Carolina courtroom, defense lawyers
for two animal-cruelty defendants asked a judge to dismiss dozens of
criminal charges. The judge was unimpressed. The defendants, former
-- or perhaps still -- employees of People for the Ethical Treatment
of Animals (PETA), stand accused of killing adoptable dogs and cats
in the back of a van in 2005 and discarding their bodies in a trash
dumpster. While the saga continues to drag on without a firm trial
date, it's now settled that defendants Adria Hinkle and Andrew Cook
will indeed face felony charges that carry lengthy jail sentences.

In Greenville, WNCT-TV's Laila Muhammad reported that the detective
who arrested Hinkle and Cook testified that in addition to dead
animals, a search of the PETA van turned up "a digital camera with
pictures of living and dead animals and vials of substances later
determined to be drugs used to euthanize animals." [click here to
watch a video of the WNCT report]

In addition to felony-level cruelty to animals charges, these two
"people for the ethical treatment of animals" are charged with
obtaining property by false pretenses. According to an employee of a
North Carolina veterinarian, Hinkle and Cook promised to find
suitable homes for three kittens, but killed them just hours later
without even bringing them back to PETA's Virginia headquarters.

For more background information about this disturbing case, visit
www.PetaKillsAnimals.com. In addition to photos of PETA's furry
victims (and the "death kit" tackle box they allegedly used), you can
see government reports filed by PETA describing the 14,419 dogs,
cats, puppies, and kittens the group has admitted killing since July
1998.

Wow, if only Looney-bin was still active, ha!

Erm. No it's not.

peta are 1 of the best organizations out there. i def know thats true. i donate to them every month.

If I remember correct you are the animal supporter right? The guy with the thread with the nasty images?

Dude, if you want to HELP animals, you need to STOP donating to PETA. Because you're not helping... AT ALL!

Donate to the SPCA or whatever its local equivalent it instead. Or find a more specific organisation (Save the Zebras/Whales/Pot-Bellied-Pig or whatever floats your boat).

PETA are a bunch of vegetarian fundies. I'm all for animal rights (hell, one of my favourite people is Bob Kerridge, a major member of the NZRSPCA), but it is ludicrious(sp?) to chastise people for eating meat, when ANIMAL'S EAT MEAT! A person can be vegetarian or vegan if they want, I don't care, but PETA takes it too far.

Well that report of Havoc's has really changed what I thought about PETA. Nearly 14 and a half thousand animals killed? No way can that be justified. And nate, do you mean the RSPCA? I donate to them now and then, they seem to be OK as an animal welfare group.

RSPCA in countries where we respect, honour and obey the British Royal Family. SPCA in some other countries. And I don't know what it's called elsewhere.

PETA goes wild: Wants dictionary to jump through hoops
 

Whoohoo! More crazy PETA news!

---

PETA goes wild: Wants dictionary to jump through hoops

PETA activists are cracking the whip on Springfield-based Merriam-Webster, demanding that the definition of “circus” be rewritten to label the big top as cruel to “captive” animal performers.
The dictionary currently defines a circus as “an arena often covered by a tent and used for variety shows, usually including feats of physical skill, wild animal acts, and performances by clowns.”
But People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals - known for caging naked women to protest the wearing of fur and protesting the living conditions of pet store iguanas - wants a new entry.


PETA’s proposal defines a circus as a “spectacle that relies on captive animals” who are “forced to perform tricks under the constant threat of punishment.” It also wants the definition to say that “modern circuses include only willing human performers.”
The dictionary publishing company couldn’t be reached last night, but, in a letter to Merriam-Webster provided to the Herald, PETA points out that “whips, chains, muzzles, and bullhooks are the standard tools used to train and constantly control animals used in circuses.”
“The sight of these weapons makes the animals perform out of sheer terror,” the letter states.
The letter also refers to undercover investigations that have revealed squalid conditions for circus animals as well as animals being mercilessly beaten by trainers. PETA says attendance is down at traditional shows like Ringling Bros. and Barnum & Bailey Circus while crowds at human-based performances like Cirque Du Soleil are at an all-time high. A Ringling spokesman did not return a call.
“People who use your dictionary deserve an accurate description of this cruel business, and we hope that you’ll consider our suggestion,” the PETA letter states.
Circuses that feature trained animals are banned in six countries and more than 300 U.S. cities and towns, including Revere. A pending State House bill to prohibit exotic animals in Massachusetts circuses is expected to go to a Senate vote this year.
“As more and more people become aware of the cruelty and violence that goes on behind the scenes at circuses, we felt the definition needed to be updated,” said PETA spokesman Matthew Rice.
Merriam-Webster routinely updates definitions, frequently considering public input.