Oddworld Forums

Oddworld Forums (http://www.oddworldforums.net/index.php)
-   Off-Topic Discussion (http://www.oddworldforums.net/forumdisplay.php?f=9)
-   -   Sex #2 (http://www.oddworldforums.net/showthread.php?t=18752)

Disgruntled Intern 12-09-2009 08:56 AM

:

()
There is non, why?

I was just curious.

Havoc 12-09-2009 09:13 AM

Ah okay.

MA, I didn't spark this furry porn conversation last I checked.

Sekto Springs 12-09-2009 09:15 AM

You don't have to be the source, Havoc, the point is you exacerbate it.
And that's just one of two words with a "bate" suffix that comes to mind when it comes to you and anything furry.

MA 12-09-2009 10:41 AM

:

()
Ah okay.

MA, I didn't spark this furry porn conversation last I checked.

you automatically spark everything to do with the world of furries on OWF. even when you're not online. your persona demands it.

just like when BM was exempt from being infected with the 'Gunnus Punnus Syndrome' back in that one thread, due to his user name.

MeechMunchie 12-09-2009 11:42 AM

:

()
I only. Come on girls, lol

Fix'd.

For anybody who doesn't get it, I'm impliying his sex is him on his own, and he wishes girls would join him.

OANST 12-09-2009 11:46 AM

LUCYYYY! YOU GOT SOME 'SPLAININ' TO DO!

MeechMunchie 12-09-2009 11:49 AM

I've got a random meme, can I post that here?

OANST 12-09-2009 12:06 PM


MeechMunchie 12-09-2009 12:10 PM

http://static.funnyjunk.com/pictures/gryffindor.png

Leto 12-09-2009 03:01 PM

http://www.aprilwinchell.com/images/fishfap1.jpg
http://www.aprilwinchell.com/images/fishfap2.jpg
http://www.aprilwinchell.com/images/fishfap3.jpg
http://www.aprilwinchell.com/images/fishfap4.jpg
http://www.aprilwinchell.com/images/fishfap5.jpg

Havoc 12-09-2009 11:59 PM

http://rob.nu/wp-content/uploads/2009/11/unseen2.jpg

T-nex 12-10-2009 12:40 AM

Pfft.. You know you like it.

Havoc 12-10-2009 01:24 AM

Nooo... nooo I don't!

Nate 12-10-2009 01:34 AM

:

()
you automatically spark everything to do with the world of furries on OWF. even when you're not online. your persona demands it.

Except Havoc only rarely brings up his furriness. It's always people like Sekto who have nothing wittier to say than pointing out someone else's predilections as if it's something important.

I mean, seriously, that shit hasn't been funny since 2004.

Sekto Springs 12-10-2009 04:33 AM

I don't hate Havoc for being a furry. I hate him for being an asshole. The furryness is just the most obvious thing to scapegoat him for.

Don't blame me, Nate. He does it to himself, and my presence here wouldn't change the general attitude towards him. But just in case it does; to those of you who hate on Havoc because I do, knock it off! Get your own reasons. There are plenty to choose from.

Strike Witch 12-10-2009 04:46 AM

:

()
Except Havoc only rarely brings up his furriness. It's always people like Sekto who have nothing wittier to say than pointing out someone else's predilections as if it's something important.

I mean, seriously, that shit hasn't been funny since 2004.

I agree with you 100%.

:

Don't blame me, Nate. He does it to himself
That doesn't seem right.

Wings of Fire 12-10-2009 04:51 AM

One thing you can definitly say about Havoc is that he takes all of it on the chin. I've seen him be vindictive through his lack of humour but I've never seen him give out such low blows in response to what he recieves.

T-nex 12-10-2009 04:52 AM

But sometimes he really deserves it! Like when he talks about girls as if they are nothing but pieces of meat to fuck :(

Strike Witch 12-10-2009 04:54 AM

:

()
But sometimes he really deserves it! Like when he talks about girls as if they are nothing but pieces of meat to fuck :(

I know, but that's not got anything to do with being a furry. So don't call him a tigerfucker when you can call him a wanker.

Wings of Fire 12-10-2009 04:55 AM

That's obviously far worse than any fetish involving animals, so why do any arguments we have about his more unsavoury habits all boil down to 'LOL YOU LIKE ANIMALS'. What he says about being a furry is blatently a form of self parody more times than not.

EDIT: Ghost beat me D:

T-nex 12-10-2009 04:55 AM

I never called him tigerfucker or anything like that. I honestly don't judge people based on their fetishes (unless they harm others). But he IS a wanker. That's true :D

Havoc 12-10-2009 05:19 AM

I love how this page is all about me. XD

And T-nex, just about every straight guy thinks like that on the most basic of levels. Not just me. The entire 'love you routine' is there for the sole reason of making you think otherwise, because we know what you want to hear. The fact that I'm the one telling you about it makes me seem like the asshole, while in reality every guy who ever looked at you, or dated you (or some other woman, if you're going to take it personal), had only one primary thing in mind; what is the easiest and quickest way to get into her pants. EVEN if you're in a relationship where you've never had sex but love each other, sex is one of the primary things in a guy's mind.

If a man sees a beautiful woman on the street, you really think the first thought in his head is how to get into a relationship with that girl? The first thought in any man's head is: Damn, that's hot. I'd do her.

Regardless of actually chasing her or whatever, that thought is the very first thought in a man's head when he sees an attractive woman. Even men in relationships tend to react that way, even more so when in a group.

It's how we, as a gender, are programmed to think. And that doesn't make me an asshole, that makes all straight men assholes. And thus, doesn't really make me stand out at all from anyone else.

Wings of Fire 12-10-2009 05:24 AM

I don't think so.

T-nex 12-10-2009 05:29 AM

:

()
I love how this page is all about me. XD

And T-nex, just about every straight guy thinks like that on the most basic of levels. Not just me. The entire 'love you routine' is there for the sole reason of making you think otherwise, because we know what you want to hear. The fact that I'm the one telling you about it makes me seem like the asshole, while in reality every guy who ever looked at you, or dated you (or some other woman, if you're going to take it personal), had only one primary thing in mind; what is the easiest and quickest way to get into her pants. EVEN if you're in a relationship where you've never had sex but love each other, sex is one of the primary things in a guy's mind.

If a man sees a beautiful woman on the street, you really think the first thought in his head is how to get into a relationship with that girl? The first thought in any man's head is: Damn, that's hot. I'd do her.

Regardless of actually chasing her or whatever, that thought is the very first thought in a man's head when he sees an attractive woman. Even men in relationships tend to react that way, even more so when in a group.

It's how we, as a gender, are programmed to think. And that doesn't make me an asshole, that makes all straight men assholes. And thus, doesn't really make me stand out at all from anyone else.

Im fairly sure this is called projecting one owns' feelings onto other. Just because you're an asshole doesn't mean everyone is.

Of course, the initial attraction between genders are purely physical, but depending on the guy and the girl, it will flourish into more than just sex.

You're wrong about people dating others purely for sex. That's a really fucked up stance to have, and you only prove yourself to be more of an asshole than I thought.

I haven't dated much. As I said earlier I didn't really have any interest in guys until I was maybe 16... But would you say that Chris only 'dates' me cos he wants to fuck me?
He never loved me? He never cared about me?... have you never cared about someone? Are you really as heartless as to just lie to girls ... To make them believe that they mean something to you in order to get into their pants?
That's what scum do. If this is really how it is, then I feel bad for your gf. Only pathetic losers lie to girls in order to get sex. Real guys would at least have the decency to make it clear that this is only sex and nothing more.
Hiding behind lies makes you scum, and I honestly know guys who DON'T act like you... Guys who either really care about girls, or just like to have fun string-free sex. The latter let the girls KNOW that that is all that it is, and there are plenty of girls up for that.
Prey on girls who you wont hurt, asshole.

OANST 12-10-2009 05:53 AM

I beat this conversation by at least a week. I am a revolutionary mind.

Havoc 12-10-2009 06:23 AM

:

()
Im fairly sure this is called projecting one owns' feelings onto other. Just because you're an asshole doesn't mean everyone is.

Of course, the initial attraction between genders are purely physical, but depending on the guy and the girl, it will flourish into more than just sex.

You're wrong about people dating others purely for sex. That's a really fucked up stance to have, and you only prove yourself to be more of an asshole than I thought.

I haven't dated much. As I said earlier I didn't really have any interest in guys until I was maybe 16... But would you say that Chris only 'dates' me cos he wants to fuck me?
He never loved me? He never cared about me?... have you never cared about someone? Are you really as heartless as to just lie to girls ... To make them believe that they mean something to you in order to get into their pants?
That's what scum do. If this is really how it is, then I feel bad for your gf. Only pathetic losers lie to girls in order to get sex. Real guys would at least have the decency to make it clear that this is only sex and nothing more.
Hiding behind lies makes you scum, and I honestly know guys who DON'T act like you... Guys who either really care about girls, or just like to have fun string-free sex. The latter let the girls KNOW that that is all that it is, and there are plenty of girls up for that.
Prey on girls who you wont hurt, asshole.

I never said that all men date women just to fuck. I said that the initial attraction is based on lust, not on love. The first thing a guy thinks about when seeing an attractive woman is how sex would be with that women, not how many children he wants to have with her. It's a very basic male fact.

I don't know about Chris. If you guys met for the first time in a bar then he just might have, I don't know. But as far as I know, you two met online and got together after knowing each other for a long time. That's not what I'm talking about. I'm talking about the initial attraction, the first look. I also didn't say that we think about sex exclusively, where did you get that from?

And there is a difference between thinking and doing. I never lied to girls about sex/love but there are guys who do, which is stupid. Telling a girl you'll love her forever and yada yada while you know up front you're just in it for the pussy is, indeed, an asshole thing to do. That does not take away the fact that most, if not all, men think about having sex with that cute blonde that just walked past. That's the initial attraction, lasting like 5 seconds, but it's there.

And seriously, you can't judge if a guy is 'like me' or not because no guy will ever show that side of himself to a girl. What do you expect them to say to you? "Yeah, I know you have a boyfriend, but you're hot non the less and I'd do you."

Just because we think that way doesn't mean we don't know it's a stupid thing to say, and is only good for making an ass of yourself.

T-nex 12-10-2009 06:27 AM

Duurrr why didn't you just say so? Everyone knows that the initial attraction is physical.


But if you really aren't like that then don't say stuff like this:

:

()
And T-nex, just about every straight guy thinks like that on the most basic of levels. Not just me. The entire 'love you routine' is there for the sole reason of making you think otherwise, because we know what you want to hear.



Anyway I don't really mind guys who just want girls for the sex.. As long as the girl is 100% with it, and the guy makes it a nice time for her.

OANST 12-10-2009 06:30 AM

In this thread: Havoc is sensible and insightful. He ain't lyin' ladies!


I love April. I don't want to be with anyone else. But my first thoughts when meeting her were more about her tits than her personality.

Havoc 12-10-2009 06:33 AM

:

()
But if you really aren't like that then don't say stuff like this:

I was more referring to the morons who tell girls that without meaning it and stuff. Guess that wasn't very clear. My bad.

T-nex 12-10-2009 06:34 AM

Yes... Your bad! I demand an apology.

Havoc 12-10-2009 06:39 AM

Sorry :(

MA 12-10-2009 07:48 AM

guess what? i don't hate Havoc. i never have done. whoopidoo he's irritating at times, and can be extremely peripheral, but i don't find that a good enough reason to hate. i hate Ackro, and Sally is my nemesis, but that's it.

and WoF is spot on; he takes it on the chin. i mean he could have replied to me like a cunt many a time when i commented on him sparking all furry conversations in existence here, but he didn't.

Dipstikk 12-10-2009 11:02 AM

I'm going to send this to everyone I know.

Havoc 12-10-2009 11:33 AM

DUDE!! WHY DID YOU QUOTE THAT!!

OANST 12-10-2009 11:36 AM

What? This?


Gretin 12-10-2009 11:40 AM

While I certainly don't agree with this:

:

...every guy who ever looked at you, or dated you (or some other woman, if you're going to take it personal), had only one primary thing in mind; what is the easiest and quickest way to get into her pants. EVEN if you're in a relationship where you've never had sex but love each other, sex is one of the primary things in a guy's mind.

Havoc does have a point that initial attraction is based on lust. But that's kind of a given, because how could it be based on anything else if it's a person you've never met before? Although I think it's going a bit far to say every guy thinks about having sex with any good looking girl he sees.

But what I really want to say is; girls aren't actually so different. It seems to me that the stereotypes over-emphasise guys' sex-drive and under-emphasise girls' sex-drive.

I grew up presented with both of those stereotypes and in my early teens I believed that was the way it was; guys liked sex and girls hardly gave it any thought. But having had a few close female friends since then (only one of whom was romantic, and that one's been my girlfriend for 3 and a half years now), I quickly learned that girls are just as interested in sex as guys.

So basically all I'm trying to say is, Havoc does have a point, but that applies equally to girls as it does to guys - we're not the completely alien creatures to each other that it's often made out like. But I'm probably just rambling about stuff everyone already knows, so I'll shut up now :p

Josh 12-10-2009 11:40 AM

Havoc, you don't have to look at it.

♪♫Just don't look, just don't look....♪♫

OANST 12-10-2009 11:41 AM

:

()
While I certainly don't agree with this:



Havoc does have a point that initial attraction is based on lust. But that's kind of a given, because how could it be based on anything else if it's a person you've never met before? Although I think it's going a bit far to say every guy thinks about having sex with any good looking girl he sees.

But what I really want to say is; girls aren't actually so different. It seems to me that the stereotypes over-emphasise guys' sex-drive and under-emphasise girls' sex-drive.

I grew up presented with both of those stereotypes and in my early teens I believed that was the way it was; guys liked sex and girls hardly gave it any thought. But having had a few close female friends since then (only one of whom was romantic, and that one's been my girlfriend for 3 and a half years now), I quickly learned that girls are just as interested in sex as guys.

So basically all I'm trying to say is, Havoc does have a point, but that applies equally to girls as it does to guys - we're not the completely alien creatures to each other that it's often made out like. But I'm probably just rambling about stuff everyone already knows, so I'll shut up now :p

This post made balls ache.

Gretin 12-10-2009 12:18 PM

My work here is done.

T-nex 12-10-2009 01:33 PM

:

()
guess what? i don't hate Havoc. i never have done. whoopidoo he's irritating at times, and can be extremely peripheral, but i don't find that a good enough reason to hate. i hate Ackro, and Sally is my nemesis, but that's it.

Why anyone would hate him is beyond me. THis is a forum, and if someone seriously spends time and energy to HATE someone it's their loss. I doubt he gives a fuck.


That's also why you shouldn't hate people such as Ackro. They may seem annoying to you, but Ackro is hardly a threat. He just so happens to annoy some folks. But that's hardly hate-worthy either.


Now, I'm not saying I absolutely love these guys, but hating them is just a waste. It's better to accept those we tread these forums with, it would otherwise be a big bunch of flames.


Also... My post complaining about what Havoc said isn't so much against him, but against what he said.. Simply. I hate guys who alter the truth, and manipulate girls into thinking they are cared for, then only to be dumped once the guy has blown his load into her. It makes me sick.
But yea, I know not only guys do this. In fact that are plenty of girl-whores out there too. And some girls tend to be rather evil.

Girls are hysterical and sensitive... And I'm not even lying. But I guess it's whats programmed into us to be able to take care of kids and yada yada. But then again I may be wrong, since I haven't studied this a lot.

But yea. Evil guys are evil, and so are some girls.


Anyway I still don't believe that every guy initially only thinks about sex. Some guys I've talked to actually WANT to have a meaningful relationship. All guys like sex, and many of them would take any offer (if it was up to their standards I guess). But that doesn't mean that's all they want. I bet if they met a girl, talked a bit to her and they clicked... He'd be more into HER rather than her body.
But then again, I may be just dreaming and totally naive. I just don't think so. Guys are capable to think with more than their dicks(sometimes).