My mom almost left my dad for being innapporate.

I can't believe it. I can't. Never in all my time of sticking my hand up a cow's arse have I seen something so disgusting.

i knew i shouldnt have posted that.

but good point.

What, the glistening smeg covered horsedick or his retch?

Is it me, or has this forum become increasingly crude with its sexual desciptions and things?

It to be Double endtendres then innuendo now its smeg covered horse cocks.

I blame you, Pilot, and all your smeg covered horse cock ways :tard:

It's up to you whether you interpret it as a sarcastic comment or a naff joke. Whichever you decide, it will be obvious when you have decided.

I bet havoc has a fantasy about tigers

No shit, Sherlock.
I bet I'm wrong after saying that

I once had an erotic fantasy about being a woman and having sex with myself, does this make me pangender or merely a narcissist?

No

No shit, Sherlock!

I prefer cheetahs, but not sexually. >__>'

Well I checked with Freud, and he says you want to fuck your mother.
I admireFreud's works and agree with some of his theories but come on. Dude was obsessed with incest.

I challenge you to find any sexual dream which Freud would not say is oedipal.

You know, I think you've found the one challenge I can't complete. At least, not without the aid of others.

You don't want me to turn to the dark side and consult Skinner, do you?

Skinner represents the very worst aspect of scientific reductionism :p I'd rather you turn to the modern side and consult someone who was alive when they took down the wall.

I'm a zoosexual zoophile, I love my dog; I don't hate them, I'm not desperate: - I don't use peanut butter and force myself on dogs; I have sex with him, but do you your spouse?

Just wanted to receive your opinion on this matter, and your thoughts about the likes of me; I'm interested in receiving your input; I am a researcher.

Regards,
ZU Researcher: Dr James D Smith, Utrecht.

Great.

...what is it about this topic and attracting Zoophilliacs? do they regularly google their fetish and rush to defend it?

Is that you, ILuvMares?

Anyway, whatever. You like to fuck your dog. Who cares? I don't go around making statements like "Hi. My name is Karl Barishnikov. I'm a doctor, and I like to have sex with women. I just thought that I would come here and mention that I'm not desperate. Women will and do have sex with me. I don't even have to bribe them, or use my powers of hypnosis (which as a doctor I have) on them to get them to let me stick my penis inside of their vaginas. If you have any opinions on how awesome I am, and how totally fucking cool it is that I have had sex with women, I would like to know. I am a researcher, researching how cool I am. With this research I intend to make myself even more the fucking shit so that more women will allow me to put my penis into even more holes".

God, you people are annoying.

this is Oddworld Forums, not a zoophile sanctuary. just fuck off.

also i don't believe you are any sort of doctor. you use too many of these ;;;;;;.
nice first post.

EDIT: actually with Havoc running around, OWF probably is a zoophile sanctuary.

Ha, you should see how many non-zoophiles run to non-zoophile threads; say, they can talk!

Anyway, I am a rights advocate, also; I'm strictly here for opinions.

Define 'fetish':
"A form of sexual*desire in which gratification depends to an abnormal degree on some object or item of clothing or part of the body"

Well, uh, normally zoophiles love the animal as a person, only desperate deviants masturbate with certain components of an animals body, human or not, alive or not, whatever age, whatever gender; even if not even an animal, at that! Now that is deviancy and desperation!

Not all zoophiles have sex, but all have the sexual and romantic attraction to their partner, and the true zoophile is a monogamous one ('heh, why else do they call it the 'other' half?').

Plus, despite 'zoo' meaning 'animal'; zoophiles whom love different species don't mix.

So don't go saying 'stop having sex with that goat, billy no mates'; because I doubt a dog lover, like me (and most certainly won't), have sex with a goat, cow, or horse (let alone are those three hedonistic and understanding in compatibility of the love of our species, but whatever takes your heart :P).

But to build rights on one species, and not all zoophiles, will spark 'zoophilic speciesism', and no one will support the love towards 'animal'; hence we tend to group all species together and call it 'zoophilic zoosexuality'; despite the obvious sounding of 'animals are different, and are lesser than us', because, I for one, oppose that whole concept, as a lover of 'animals'.

However both dogs and humans are animals; despite that, 'zoo' specifies non-human animals. I can't say my partner isn't dog, because he isn't human. So, I keep the 'zoo' principle, and so do many others.

I often get called a 'sheep fucker', although, it is clear I do not have sex with sheep. I'd never have sex with something I don't think shows good signs of consent, like sheep. A dog does, and I love my dog for one, despite the numerous selection of men and women in my social life; I fell in love with my dog, and that's that way it will stay; I'd put my life on the line for my love, it is that strong, I'm sure you'd do so for your love, too, right (well, despite the coming-of-age non-passionate human-to-human relationships, for money; I'm afraid that doesn't exist in most zoophilic relationships (unless of course the animal (in the unlikelihood) has money))?

Despite my pretentious presentation towards zoophilia; I favour my sexuality, because it is my own, just as you do yours, I'm not saying zoophilia is any higher than non-zoophilia, despite LGBT's ferment on supremacy (zoophiles often adopt the peaceful natures of their partners); there are just a lot of zoosexual zoophiles about socially and/or legally, thanks to LGBT, religion, and animal rights over the set examples of bestialists and zoosadists (the media seems to pick only few of least articles where already illegal animal brutality is featured in sex (combining the two (cruelty and sex) makes it sound complimented and creates anti-zoophiles daily); ah, may be because true zoophiles keep their private lives in the bedroom like normal people do, in fear of social/legal humiliation/threat?).

Regards,
ZU Research Department

So you're a dog fucker.

yep, didn't read any of that fucking dribble. why is it that all you zoophile's post immense amounts of text that no one could give a shit less about? only thing i want you to do (other than to stop fondling your dog) is to go away.

also you said you're here to research people's opinions on zoophilia, and yet you just defended it with "don't go saying this...don't go doing that", i mean what a load of bollocks? you just contradicted yourself in 2 posts. surely if you were here to research views and opinions on zoophilia from people that don't get turned on by a mongrel, you would be asking why we don't support it, instead of defending it.

Regards,
Someone Who Believes You Are In The Wrong Place

I don't know how many people have chatted me up, but I don't believe in cheating, thank you, very much.

You seem to be keen that I'm a virgin to human sexuality; well by social force, I have even had kids.

And the 'comma' key wasn't as efficient as it used to be (snapped out a week back, but now fixed, it has become an OCD now, I believe), (yes see ',') I used try to use in the most independent clauses; (like here) now I tend to accidentally do it regularly by OCD. Yet, you've reminded me, so thank you.

My PhD is nothing to do with this level of research (despite being sexological and evolutionary (dynamics)), may be that's why you seem baffled?

Ah, see I have an explanation for everything; yet, it you whom judges from your own perspective, your own opinion; just remember not always yours is correct. Live and let live, pal!

And thanks for your warm welcome :D!

I see you finding human faults rather than specific zoophilic ones; ah, yes, zoophilia is not bad, see, no, no?

I just see insults and bad integrity. May be the thing that should shock you is that I am also human, and what your race is capable of, despite your reasoning for my cause, who I am; and whether I'm not joking or not. May be you are too judgemental.

He says he is a zoophile > Roll on hatred > Censor > Insult (slightly).

And no, my partner is not a mongrel!

I honestly don't get you, Doc. The fucking animals thing I get, but the whole love bit. I can understand a comradery, or a companionship between you and your dog, but love? That's a bit far.

May be :D... May be not, may that matter be...

as BM once said "Never argue with an idiot, they will just bring you down to their level and beat you." i was baiting you, you fucking moron.

what is your purpose here? i just know you are going to defend this to the very (furry) end and then piss off. do you even know what this place is about? and i am sure Ghost was right about you searching for zoophilia. how very sad.

also your grammar is fucking terrible. too cluttered, even for an OCD. Oddjob would have a field day.

EDIT: wow you double posted. you really are smart, doc.
what the? where the fuck did you graduate from?

You're one to talk.

Since when was giving pleasure too far; my extension love bypassed the social firewall of the anti-zoo, I'm happy, my partners happy, you aren't about me, but you are happy in yourself, no?

Heh, well, seen as humans are also animals, that is conceptual speciesism with no reason, but doubt.