I, BM
299 792 458 m·s^−1 6.67384(80)×10−11 m³·kg^−1·s−2 6.626 069 57(29) × 10^−34 J·s 1.054 571 726(47) × 10^−34 J·s 4π × 10^−7 N·A^−2 = 1.256 637 061... × 10^−6 N·A^−2 8.854 187 817... × 10^−12 F·m−1 376.730 313 461... Ω 8.987 551 787... × 109 N·m²·C^−2 1.602 176 565(35) × 10^−19 C 9.274 009 68(20) × 10^−24 J·T^−1 7.748 091 7346(25) × 10^−5 S 12 906.403 7217(42) Ω 4.835 978 70(11) × 10^14 Hz·V−1 2.067 833 758(46) × 10^−15 Wb 5.050 783 53(11) × 10^−27 J·T^−1 25 812.807 4434(84) Ω 5.291 772 1092(17) × 10^−11 m 2.817 940 3267(27) × 10^−15 m 9.109 382 91(40) × 10^−31 kg 1.166 364(5) × 10^−5 GeV^−2 7.297 352 5698(24) × 10^−3 4.359 744 34(19) × 10^−18 J 1.672 621 777(74) × 10^−27 kg 3.636 947 5520(24) × 10^−4 m² s^−1 10 973 731.568 539(55) m^−1 6.652 458 734(13) × 10^−29 m² 0.2223(21) 1.660 538 921(73) × 10^−27 kg 6.022 141 29(27) × 10^23 mol^−1
 |
|
 |
||
 |
I was wrong. THIS is the best thing Experimental Vibrational Analysis for Hire.Visual Image Reconstruction from Human Brain Activity using a Combination of Multiscale Local Image Decoders
I'll make this as simple as I can for you. This is the image that the subject looked at. v  ^ And this is the image that Now Yukiyasu Kamitani at ATR Computational Neuroscience Laboratories in Kyoto, Japan, directly extracted from the subject's brain via an MRI scan. Yes, ladies and gentlemen. Mind reading has become a reality for 21st Century Earth. This is the first "mind-reading" technology that can create images from scratch rather than picking it out of a selection of prepared images. Earlier this year Jack Gallant and his colleagues at the university of California showed that they could tell which of a set of images someone was looking at from a brain scan. They did this by developing software that compared the subject's brain activity while looking at training photographs. But Yukiyasu Kamitani's breakthrough actually puts together an image using the data from the brain scans themselves. Kamitani: "By analysing the brain signals when someone is seeing an image, we can reconstruct that image." At the moment, the resolution of the output and sensitivity of the instruments means that only simple, contrasting images can be read. They do this by making the subject look at several 10/10 squares while having their brain scanned. The new software finds the brain activity that corresponds to each pixel being blacked out. Then, when the test image is used, such as the word "neuron" above, the software compares the brain activity observed with the catalogue of data from that subject's brain. The results, as you see above, are the proof of concept. As fMRI technology improves, the resolution could be increased substantially. The next step is to see if it is possible to image things people are thinking of as well as looking at. Dream videos, anyone? Not of mine, though, God no. I wouldn't subject you to that. Or myself to the courts. |
 |
||
 |
 |
|||
 |
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
Recent Blog Entries by Bullet Magnet
|
|
||
|
|
|||
|
|
|
