I’m staggered that it took this long for anyone to comment on the possibility of these creatures to be redesigned Paramites and Scrabs. It was the first thing that crossed my mind when I saw them, and is one of the reasons I wanted these images to be shown last. I wanted the images released in ascending order of discrepancy from the Oddworld we might be expecting.
Lorne has already said that many of the Oddworld characters were designed the way they were because of limited CG resources at the time and, now that technology has advanced, he would like to see the Oddworld creatures closer to how he originally imagined them. The example he gave was always having envisioned Sligs as having pig-like hair. Reducing the number of limbs on Paramites and removing their scales fits into this, and the redesigned creatures we are possibly seeing could just be a reversion to original ideas.
I’m not sure I like them. I’m not going to call cliché without having anything to cite as evidence, but the new design make Paramites very obviously arthropodean*, whereas the Paramites we’re familiar with are clearly mammalian with arthropod habits and quirks. As much I disliked the sound changes in Munch’s Oddysee, they emphasized this. It made Paramites more alien because they clearly didn’t fit into any Earth phylogeny, not by any stretch of the imagination. They had a very unfamiliar and innovative new body shape.
Then again, it needs to be pointed out these paintings are more than anything done to establish scenes, settings, moods, lighting, angles, composition, and be cool to appeal to greenlighters. The different design could just be something Raymond was toying with, or something that was considered at the time but has since been replaced with a more familiar Paramite.
As for those being Scrabs… since when could Scrabs be tamed and ridden? I’m seriously hoping those aren’t Scrabs. It would completely ruin the point. You don’t use a creature for livestock if it’s a beast of burdon. Either you select it for strength and endurance, or you select it for what it produces.
I have more to say, but I’ll wait till later.
* Apparently this is the right word, although I prefer both ‘arthropoid’ and ‘arthropedic’.
|